User:Ngeer20/Syntrophobacter wolinii/Catcog Peer Review

General info
Ngeer20
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ngeer20/Syntrophobacter wolinii - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Syntrophobacter wolinii - Wikipedia

Lead
Guiding Questions


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, the lead has new information that adds a more in-depth description of the topic.
 * Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, however, it could include more information about what makes this organism unique.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The lead does not adequately mention the topics discussed in the article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Everything in the lead is discussed in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is very concise and does not contain an overwhelming amount of information.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * All of the information is relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * All the information seems to be up-to-date and relevant.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No, all of the content is helpful in introducing the organism to the reader. However, more information could be added.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * All of the content is presented in an unbiased manner.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, everything discussed has a fair amount of detail.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, every statement has one or more sources.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes, the content pulls accurate information from each source.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes, each of the sources seem to cover unique information about the topic.
 * Are the sources current?
 * The sources were not written recently but seem to provide accurate, reliable information on the topic.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * The sources used are all peer-reviewed, reliable articles from credible databases.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * All of the links work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * All of the content is easy to read and understand
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * There are no grammatical errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Each new topic presented has its own section.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * The original article has very little information, so this will be a great addition because it goes into more detail about the organism.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * It doesn't dive in to deep into content that isn't relevant. Instead, it describes the basic information in detail so that the reader is not overwhelmed with too much information.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * More specific sections could be added to convey how this organism is unique.