User:Ngln92/sandbox

Peer Review
In my opinion, I think there is not enough detail in the sections that count. I agree with the below evaluation saying that the chart of the "nine types" leaves a lot of room for greater detail. However, I feel that more detail needs to be added to sections such as history and information about the figure itself. By doing so the reader will have a better base of what the topic is before diving into the details of each individual type. Additionally, I feel that arranging some of the article's sections could be beneficial. The three paragraphs under the chart, I believe would be better served in the "figure" section. Again these paragraphs are details that describe the basic WHAT and HOW of this method, so putting them before finer detail, I believe would be more beneficial. Swatsinator (talk) 01:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Swatsinator

I think its a good start. More detail is something that this really needs. A better understanding can definitely come from putting more information about each section and subsection. Another thing that might be really useful is adding a "Enneagram in Practice" that might show studies or cases where the enneagram is either determined reliable or unreliable. It could tie into the criticism section. Also,you could tie more research to the history of popularity of the concept. You could also explore adding information about future research. This topic seems to be underdeveloped and more information about how it is used, the reliability, what each section attributes to, and how it relates to other personality models. User:TrentonJohnson (talk) 02:43 March 2020 (UTC)

Article Evaluation: "Enneagram of Personality"
While the "nine types" table is a well-organized, easy way to observe and compare each of the enneagram types, there's a lot of potential to go into greater detail on each of the types and provide more information about each of the respective types, potentially in sub-sections. An example of breakdowns or in-depth analyses on each of the nine points could be similar in format to something along the lines of this webpage on enneagram types that have an empirical and reputable basis

Machiavellianism (psychology)
Unlike the etiology of the other dark triad traits, Machiavellianism is derived from philosophical statements recorded by Niccolo Machiavelli as opposed to an analysis of clinical syndromes.

A questionnaire designed by Christie and Geis (1970) showed that those who agreed with modernized statements based on Machiavelli's philosophies and tactics behaved accordingly to Machiavellianism.