User:Nguyenmt1732/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Opioid withdrawal

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
== I chose this article because I knew someone who was addicted and abused substances. This topic matters because many people are addicted to opioids through different ways, one of them being prescribed drugs. I know withdrawals are very hard for the person addicted to the opioids and that there are lots of physical and psychological symptoms that come with it. That is why I think a lot of people get back into drugs or never commit to quitting. ==

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead describes the article's topic very clearly by defining the term opioid withdrawal and mentions the major sections of the article. I think that the lead is not too detailed but detailed enough to understand the overview of the article just by reading the lead. The article's content is relevant and adds onto the topic of opioid withdrawals. The content was updated at the beginning of this year and there is no content that is not necessary to the article. The article does not really deal with equity gaps or minorities in its content. The article is neutral and there is no particular bias in the content of the article. The content of the article is well sourced with multiple sources and the sources are still current ranging from 2008 to 2022. There are various authors each with a different background. The links work and the sources were essential to creating this article. The article is well-organized and does not have any grammatical errors. There were not that many pictures in the article and the pictures were of an opioid drug and buprenorphine patch. The pictures are well captioned and follow Wikipedia's copyright regulations. On the talk page, there were additional sources to look at, a merger proposal, and some other conversations. This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale and is in the WikiProject Medicine: neurology/psychiatry. The talk page was a little different from what I imagined because there was some talk about codes. The article's status is mid-importance and some of the article's strengths were the pathophysiology section and treatment and management. I think that they could improve this article by adding what symptoms tend to show depending on how long you are going through withdrawals if that is a thing, or list all the opioid-prescribed drugs that could get you addicted. I think that this article is nicely developed.