User:Nguyenmt1732/Malingering of post-traumatic stress disorder/Kiara44D Peer Review

General info
Nguyenmt1732
 * Whose work are you review
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Nguyenmt1732/Malingering of post-traumatic stress disorder
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Malingering of post-traumatic stress disorder

Evaluate the drafted changes
Your peer review provides a thorough analysis of the article focusing on detecting malingering of PTSD. To enhance clarity and structure, consider organizing the review into distinct sections such as Introduction, Methods, Findings, and Conclusion. Each section should delve into a specific aspect or finding to avoid overwhelming the reader. It would be beneficial to clarify the sources supporting each claim to strengthen credibility. Additionally, including detailed examples or studies illustrating how measures like the Symptom Validity Test, Performance Validity Test, Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms, CAPS, and SIRS-2 contribute uniquely to identifying PTSD malingering can provide deeper insights. Keep the language precise and accessible, avoiding technical jargon for broader comprehension. Summarize the article's key findings succinctly and offer thoughtful recommendations for future research or clinical practice, while acknowledging any limitations or biases in the study. Ensure citations and references adhere to the specified style guide for consistency and accuracy. These adjustments will refine the review's structure and impact, providing a clear evaluation of the article's importance in understanding PTSD malingering detection.