User:Nharlan18/sandbox

Nharlan18 (talk) 22:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

The article I've chosen is a biography about Sigmund Freud.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic?

Yes, everything in the article gives the reader information about who Sigmund Freud was.

Is there anything that distracted me?

Nothing distracted me in this article because it all relates to the topic of this article.

Is the information out of date?

No, the last time the article was edited was 02/07/2019.

Is there anything that needs to be added?

I don't believe that there anything else that this article needs, it already provides more than enough details about who Sigmund Freud was.

What else could be improved?

There could be more added about Freud's patients.

Is the article Neutral? Are there any claims that appear to be heavily biased.

The article is neutral, and remains unbiased throughout the whole article. The article takes an outside look into Freud's life and his work.

Are there viewpoints that seem to be underrepresented, or over represented?

Due to the fact that this article has been worked on by so many people I feel that there isn't a single viewpoint within this article that isn't represented.

Do the links work? Do the sources support the claims in the article?

Yes, the links in the article work and they support claims that were made in the article.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

The facts that I checked were backed by reliable sources. The information for the article came from books, articles, journals, and many other forms of information. There are some sources that could have some biased towards Freud. For example, Freud's journals are used as a source. However, no biased is noted.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

There hasn't been much talk about this articles recently.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

The articles is rated as a level 3 vital article and a B-Class article. The article is currently being show interest by many WikiProjects.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Wiki provides a lot more information and allows more viewpoints than just the professor's.

Nharlan18 (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_frustration https://mindcology.com/depression/sexual-frustration-leads-depression-loneliness/ https://apex-ology.com/apexblog/how-to-deal-with-sexual-frustration

The first source gives the definition of what sexual frustration is and how you can tell if you have some built up sexual frustration. The second source talks about sexual frustration can lead to depression and a lot of other mental health difficulties. The third source I chose talks about how to deal with sexual frustration if you think that this is something that you are dealing with. With this article something I want to do is give a good definition of what sexual frustration is, the effects of sexual frustration, and how to cope or overcome sexual frustration.

Nharlan18 (talk) 12:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)