User:Ni.thavong/Camerino Farnese/Ravenmariev Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ni.thavong


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * 
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Camerino Farnese

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead does give a solid overview of the important information that the article will later expand on, but there are names, locations and terms that have potential to confuse the reader (i.e. Camerino Farnese style, Allessandro Farnese cycle, Farnese Gallery, etc). If there is a way to do so without crowding the lead, try to make sense of them.

While looking through the edit history, I can see that there was a chunk of text that was deleted. This deleted content had solid information about the subject and could have been kept. I would recommend continuing fleshing out your lead or reviewing the previous work and bringing those contributions back.

Structure

The structure of the article is coming along well, as I can see that you are in the process of adding new sections titled 'About the Works' and 'Background/Context'. These both look good so far, but I did notice the inclusion of an interpretation by John Rupert Martin. Are there other interpretations? If so, maybe think about moving these interpretations into a new/separate section.

Balanced Coverage and Neutral Content

The changes to the article look good so far and do not seem to display any bias or preference. All of the information that has been provided looks neutral. The language and tone is clear, which lends to easy reading. As I shared above, it would be interesting to know if there were other interpretations of the work besides that of John Rupert Martin.

Reliable Sources

This would have to be the most egregious issue with the article so far. There are no references listed at any point. With all of the new or changed information that you have provided, I would expect to see where you found that information.

With all that being said, keep up the good work. I am excited to read the finished article. Good luck!