User:Nicgrana/Microaggression/Skymcm2015 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Nicgrana


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nicgrana/Microaggression?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Evaluate the drafted changes
I like the changes that you have made to your article so far. The sentence that you added was relevant to the topic and added additional information that backed up the other information already included. The source seems to be good as well. I think that you could possibly even add more information to article from that source, however I do think that your article really needs at least a few more additional sources. I also think that the Perpetrators section should either be expanded upon, removed or consolidated to another section. It is very short and doesn't add much to the article, however I do think that it could be made into a good contribution with added sources and information. I also think that the introduction section could be cut down to be more concise. I think it would be better if it got more into the definition of what is and then you could have another section that broke down the history of where the word originated. Overall, I think you are on a good track to improve the article.

Peer Review Response
Thank you for your suggestions! I agree that the Perpetrators section is very small and does not contribute much as it is right now. I am working on correctly wording more information to add to the article from my textbook source and you gave me a great idea on some more things that I could contribute to the article from this source to support the Perpetrators section! Personally, I think that the introduction section is pretty well-written as an overview because the following section dives more into the different parts that contribute or can be considered microaggressions.