User:Nichellecorpuz/Partulina variabilis/Narcissusgasp Peer Review

General info

 * "Nichellecorpuz"


 * User:Nichellecorpuz/Partulina variabilis :
 * Partulina variabilis:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!

Comments: - Nichelle Corpuz
 * 1) The article is concise in the information it provides, such as in Classification were they mention the species' family and subfamily. They also do well in mentioning were the species is found and what that kind of environment is like, even if it's base-level information
 * 2) The article talks about the species itself and does not go into depth about its genus or family. The subtitles used are appropriate and relevant. I have a bit of concern in the Distribution & Habitat sections; Distribution talks about how the species is dispersed throughout an environment while the Habitat goes deeper on the specific properties of the environment. It'd help to describe the environment of the species more thoroughly. Another option would to simply merge the two together.
 * 3) The citations used are relevant and linked properly. Each source is well linked to each sentence with the little citation tool. The sources used also seem to be well informed about the species. The only concern is over the fact that there are two citations for the same source, which is most likely a mistake.
 * 4) I think that in this article's case, due to the nature of distribution and habitat, they should be merged into one subtitling, either titling it Distribution or Habitat, whichever one would be most relevant. This would help beef up the amount of information present with each section.
 * 5) Again, beefing up the amount of content and information available in the article would help it best, as there's only a couple of sentences per section.
 * 6) Some of the sources used in their article will most likely be helpful to me as I'm writing my own, as I don't have as much sources as I'd like.

'''Thank you for the awesome and helpful tips in this peer review. I learned more about my article that I can improve on. I will work on continuing adding more descriptions in each section as well as fixing my redundant citation. The feedback was helpful and I will make sure to fix my errors.'''