User:Nichrox2000/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Annie Potts

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Annie Potts is an American actress that I enjoy to watch and seemed interesting to observe her wikipedia page.

Evaluate the article
The lead section describes the roles that she is known for along with awards and nominations she earned for her known roles. It is written in a way where the reader can get an aspect of the articles major sections. The content in the article is relevant to Annie Potts, all content seem to be up to date all the way up to January 2022. It seems that this article does not deal with the equity gaps because when comparing to another male costar, they had the same amount of information available. The tone for this article seems neutral and is written based on a neutral party, I found no indications of specific positions or viewpoints being represented in the article. Causing no problems with favoring certain positions. When it comes to sources and references, the article seems up to date with its sources, and indicates sources that are trusted such as the golden globe website. There are instances where the sources are taken from magazines and websites. The links that I checked in the article worked and took me to its page. The organization of this article is very well done, everything is written easily and has its respected links to other articles when needed, and each section is divided based on date and reflects on the subject. The images span from early pictures of Annie in her career to current pictures, with a caption as when and where the pictures were taken. The pictures seemed to be taken from a public domain. The talk page discussion involves a few areas of discussion, such as rumors about money disputes over a movie deal or past accidents in her life. There is talk about her birthplace and a list of articles that reference two different stories of where she was born. They also talk about rules and regulations of photos, someone wanted an updated photo and another replied that these photos were from the commons and there were none left. My overall impression of this article was that it was solid, if I had questions it answered them within the article of from its sources. If I had some notes on improvements it would be to add a but more personal info. The article has seems complete and its talk page is also well developed.