User:Nick Amato/Mass media in Zambia/Tayyy123 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nick Amato, Rjbee21


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Mass media in Zambia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mass media in Zambia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The Lead includes an introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic. It includes a brief description of the article's major sections. It only includes information present in the article. The lead is concise.

Content: The content is relevant to the topic. The content is up to date. You should add more information to each section. The article deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps, as there is limited information on many African countries.

Tone & Balance: The content is neutral. The claims are not biased.

Sources & References: Most facts are backed up by citations, although the lead section could use more citations. The sources are current. The sources are written by different authors. There is one peer-reviewed source, but you should add more. The links in the references section work.

Organization: The content could be edited to be more concise. I like the different sections.

Images & Media: The article does not include images.

Overall Impressions: The content added has improved the quality of the article. The lead section is well-written and it gives a good overview of the topic. Additionally, I like the different sections. However, I would add more citations to the lead section. Overall, I think the article is headed in the right direction.