User:NickleJac/Wind power in France/Fabulous-Fishy Peer Review

= Peer Review for NickleJac =

A. Neutral Voice
Strengths: The part that addresses the percentage of the French who have a positive opinion of wind power is presented impartially and informatively, and it thereby shows the results of the survey without prejudice. For instance, “A 2021 Harris Interactive survey shows that 76% of the French public have a positive view of wind power.”

Improvements: The segment about the objections that rise due to the deterioration of living conditions need a more balanced tone by turning these concerns into observations rather than implied criticisms. As another example, think of how to rephrase “There have been many examples of resistance to wind power developments due to the negative living environment” into something like “Some have raised concerns about the possible negative effect on living environment from these wind power developments.” I wouldn’t say it’s necessary to change it but worth a consideration.

B. Close Paraphrasing & Plagiarism
Concerns: I don’t really have any concerns about the article regarding paraphrasing or plagiarism.

Strategies: Practice activities such as summarising instead of paraphrasing word for word and more of your analysis or interpretation of the facts given. Make sure that citations always represent the source material correctly.

C. Readability
Strengths: The provided overview of public support for wind energy is clear and informative, backed up by specific survey percentages, and therefore, accessible to the reader.

Areas for improvement: By using bullet points or separate paragraphs for each concern (noise, impact on landscape, etc.), the part describing the reasons of opposition can be made to be more clear and easy to understand.

Errors: I did see that the references weren’t accurately inputted like a regular wikipedia page’s references would be. You can do this by using the cite tool if you didn’t know how to do this already.

D. Rubric Feedback
Lead Section: Make sure the opening sentence summarises the entire scope of the article in a very concise manner. Elaborating the summary to cover all main points may offer a more detailed picture from the very beginning.

Article: Improving transitions between sections might increase the coherence. Ensuring all the relevant perspectives are included will result in a balanced coverage.

References: Aim at full association of each statement with its supporting reference for clarity. Making all citation to be completely detailed will make the article more credible.

Existing Article: Comprehensive coverage and relevancy to the topic are critical in new sections or additions. Filling up any left gaps will make the article more full.

E. Final Questions/Considerations
Greatest Strength: The article contains a detailed review of both the supporters and opponents of wind power in France, based on the results of surveys and provides a fair picture of public opinion.

Area for Improvement: An improvement to the article would be achieved by making sections discussing opposition more neutral, thus, presenting a balanced view and allowing some concerns to be acknowledged but not implying criticism.

Additional Thoughts: Add a conclusion or summary to pull together the main points of the article and echo the general attitude of the French public towards the wind power developments problem, pointing out its complexity and subtleties, please.