User:Nickywithdablicky/Buchi Emecheta/Nickywithdablicky Peer Review

Lead


 * The introductory sentence includes concise details of her life and the earlier literature works that builds her career over the years.
 * The lead introduces each major sections by including the early life, novels, and career with publishers.
 * The lead did not include any information that was not present in the article.

Content


 * The content is relevant to the topic because it explains what inspired her as writer and what lead to the blossoming of her career.
 * The content is up-to-date as it was revised January 23, 2021.
 * To my review there is no missing content or any that does not belong.
 * This article does address one of Wikipedia equity gap of African writers.

Tone and Balance


 * The content provided is neutral and is cited on each statement. The was no information provided that confused me on who said it.
 * To my review, I see no biased viewpoints or any viewpoints over or underrepresented.
 * The content does not attempt to persuade the reader any way.

Sources and References


 * All content is cited by a reliable source.
 * Some sources are current from November 2019.
 * All links I reviewed do work.

Organization


 * The content is well written and articulate for readers to understand.
 * I did not see any spelling or grammatical errors.
 * The content was broken down to precise sections that transition smoothly into the next. There was not any information in the wrong section.

Images and Media


 * There was a clear image of the author. It was a well chosen image.
 * There was only one image and it was captioned to give insight on the image.
 * The image does adhere to Wikipedia copyright regulations.
 * There was only one image in the corner and it was appealing.

Overall Impressions


 * I enjoyed this article as it gave me clear concise introduction of the authors life and career, as I have not heard of this author before today.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)