User:NicoKokolis/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Cybersecurity rating


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article keeps the focus strictly on the title in which it is given. The article shows no signs of bias when talking about the topic at hand. Although there are only three notable claims made in the article with its short contents, each of those claims has a citation. The article shows no underrepresented information in its contents. Despite the talk page being as short as it is, it shows that there has been contributions made to it.


 * Sources
 * 1."Principles for Fair and Safe Security Ratings" U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 2017-06-19. Retrieved 2020-02-12.
 * 2."Innovation Insight for Security Rating Services" Gartner. Retrieved 2020-02-12.
 * 3."Adoption of security ratings platforms is on the rise" Help Net Security. 2018-04-27. Retrieved 2020-02-12.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Cross-cite platforming


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article does not stray away from the topic it is talking about. The article is strictly factual with no signs of bias present in the article. Even though one claim was made in this article, there is a citation for that one claim. The article doesn't present any shortage of expected information. The talk page at least compared to other articles is pretty empty.


 * Sources
 * 1."Cross-Cite Cooking"

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Secure file transfer program


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article does a good job with keeping its focus on the topic it is meant to go in depth upon. There is no bias in this article. There is one claim in the article so there is one citation. The duration of the article feels very short and I feel as though there could be more added to it. The talk page is very small which is explained by the duration of the article.


 * Sources
 * "sftp man page from the OpenSSH project"

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Cyber sovereignty


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article doesn't stray away from what it is talking about. No bias is present in this article. There are four claims but five citations with one claim having two citations. This article holds no shortage of information as there is a lot to this article. The talk page is not very fleshed out given the duration of the article.


 * Sources
 * Schneier, Bruce (2015). Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
 * https://web.archive.org/web/20111023154428/https://www.lemondeinformatique.fr/actualites/lire-285-millions-d-euros-pour-andromede-le-cloud-souverain-francais-41990.html
 * "France continues to pursue its own data centre infrastructure, dubbed “le cloud souverain”, despite the closure of some of the businesses initially behind the idea." https://theconversation.com/digital-colonialism-why-some-countries-want-to-take-control-of-their-peoples-data-from-big-tech-123048
 * "Numergy and Cloudwatt, each benefited from €75 million ($101 million) from the French government."
 * https://www.rudebaguette.com/2019/08/cloudwatt-orange-cloud-souverain-fin/

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Data breaches in India


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article keeps focus upon the many data breaches in India. There doesn't appear to be any bias in this article. There are many claims in this article with 51 citations on this stub page. There is nothing that could possibly be missing from this article as it is overflowing with information about the historical timeline of Indian data breaches. The talk page is plentiful and has been a part of many different WikiProjects.


 * Sources
 * Team, BS Web (2019-04-18). . Business Standard India. Retrieved 2020-12-04.
 * Oct 15, PTI /; 2018; Ist, 22:01. . The Times of India. Retrieved 2020-12-07.