User:NicolasForestell/Shelterwood cutting/Aiden Brown Peer Review

General info
NicolasForestell
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:NicolasForestell/Shelterwood cutting
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Shelterwood cutting

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi! Looks like you have a great draft coming along! Here's some of my feedback/suggestions, in no particular order:

- I really like the way you changed the organization of the article and headings/subheadings! It makes the intro less lengthy, information is easier to find, and it's just generally more organized and clear now.

- The lead looks good! It's clear, concise, and gives a good introduction/summary. I'd say this could go either way, but maybe consider adding a sentence or two addition about the cutting stages and variations to the lead, to cover those sections? Also, I'm not sure on this but some information from the lead seems to not be found anywhere else in the article, like the criteria for forests for shelterwood cutting ("normally implemented in forests that are mature, sheltered from winds, and that have 30% or more of species trying to be regenerated") maybe could also be included in part of the article that isn't the lead section?

- Adding sources/citations to existing content and removing those without citations that could be found is a good call! All information appears to be referenced from reliable sources. I see the last couple sections have no citations yet, but I'd bet you're still working on that, so not a problem. References look to be reliable and good quality. A generous number of citations are included, a drastic improvement from the original article. Links I tried worked.

- Very minor note, but it seems it's been spelled both "seed tree" and "seed-tree." Maybe pick a spelling to stick to throughout the article?

- The information added is relevant, clear, easy to understand but not overly simplified, concise, and neutral in tone. I think very few or no spelling/grammar errors are present.

- All you've been doing seems to be working well so far, so I'd recommend just continuing to do what you've been doing.

Overall, this seems like a great draft so far! Looks like you put a lot of effort into this article, and have definitely improved it. Well done, keep up the good work! :)