User:Nicole Lizbeth/Governance/Reethespiethes Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nicole Lizbeth


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nicole%20Lizbeth/Governance?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Governance

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
 * 2) The last few sentences referencing Brazil as a case study were really strong, and gave a solid sense that participatory governance is an actual practice rather than simply a theoretical framework.
 * 3) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * 4) The main thing I would suggest you change is the wording, especially in the first paragraph. A couple lines read as a bit redundant, or repeat the same couple of words enough times for the writing to feel clunky. This makes the article very dense (and honestly a little bit confusing). It might also be worth specifying where/when these community organizations and forums arose from, since right now this contribution feels rather vague.
 * 5) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 6) I think beyond fixing the clunkiness, you have made a really good contribution to this section! It's obviously been a little neglected and you have added a lot of really relevant and well-researched knowledge. Your content, tone, and sources all look great.
 * 7) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know.