User:Nicolecmerhi/Mirabal Sisters/Danifuchs Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nicolecmerhi


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Nicolecmerhi/Mirabal Sisters/


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead of this draft is engaging and provides some background information on the sisters and their impact. The content of this draft is extremely relevant and up to date. The writing is concise, and none of the language appears to be biased in any way. It is clear and neutral. Looking through the sources it appears like the information provided in the article is reflected in the source articles. It does not seem like all of the links to the sources are accurate or easy to access, however this could be because of where it is coming from. All the sources are not current, however I do not think that is a problem seeing as the legacy of these sisters seems to appear in the 1980s. This draft is also very good because there are two different wikipedia articles written about them as well that can be linked to this one, therefore creating more of a profile for the sisters. I think the draft is well organized, and although there are no pictures included it does not appear to be necessary given the information included about the sister's work. Overall I believe this is a very solid draft. There could possibly be more information located in peer-reviewed journals about the sisters, however the information already included does a nice job on its own showing the life of these sisters.