User:Nics547/sandbox

Model Article
Rami Malek

Link to Article Draft
User:Nics547/sandboxVR

Virtual Reality Article Evaluation

 * Everything in the article is relevant to the topic. The only thing that distracted me were the out of date photos.
 * There is some out of date information, the technology section does need more information added. What is really missing is any information about VR after 2016, everything just sorta stops there in terms of history. I would also like to add a section dedicated to gaming or just update the applications section overall.
 * I think that the contents table could be improved and how it is set up. There also needs to be more links in the article itself to navigate the reader to other sources about different aspects regarding VR. The pictures used could be updated and the history section could be reorganized to have a better flow.
 * I would say that the article is pretty neutral, except for the privacy section. The author of that section seems to be a bit too paranoid about the tracking capabilities of VR.
 * Viewpoints about gaming and new age applications of VR are underrepresented.
 * The citations do work.
 * Most of the information does seem to be referenced with a reliable source. However the privacy section would need to be modified to have some information to back the authors claims.
 * There really isn't any conversations going on in the Talk page, just someone suggesting to not have a "In Fiction or Pop Culture" section.

Good Article Criteria
A good article is:


 * 1) Well written:
 * 2) the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
 * 3) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
 * 4) Verifiable with no original research:
 * 5) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
 * 6) all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
 * 7) it contains no original research; and
 * 8) it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
 * 9) Broad in its coverage:
 * 10) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
 * 11) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
 * 12) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
 * 13) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
 * 14) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
 * 15) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
 * 16) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.