User:Nightscream/Talk Page of Josephjames21 October 2008 - February 2010

Speedy deletion of To Be Determined
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MANdARAX •  XAЯAbИAM  10:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Little context in FCW Florida Women's Championship
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on FCW Florida Women's Championship, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because FCW Florida Women's Championship is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting FCW Florida Women's Championship, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of WWE SmackDown! vs. Raw 2009
A tag has been placed on WWE SmackDown! vs. Raw 2009 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Matt  (  Talk  )   22:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

KyleeAna Pratta
Make any more disruptive moves and you will be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Amalthea Talk 20:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Amalthea Talk 20:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Beverly Mullins
Why? I am only doing what other wikipedians do.....your version does not sound right.

Art 281 (talk) 03:54, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

and yours does? Josephjames21 (talk) 17:30, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:WesselyHoliday.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:WesselyHoliday.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:WesselyHoliday.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:WesselyHoliday.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:WesselyHoliday.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:WesselyHoliday.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Asher196 (talk) 16:37, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Wesley Holiday (Beverly Mullins)
Why? I am only doing what other wikipedians do.....your version does not sound right.

i even put reference links and about her early career

im only doing what's right, also im fixing the article too because the current version doesnt sound right

Spike7000 (talk) 08:39, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Josephjames21, repeatedly threatening other editors with blocks when they revert you changes is not constructive. Per WP:Consensus and WP:BRD, if your bold edit is reverted, you should go to the articles page and discuss it. It also is very helpful to explain your edits in the Edit summary. In this particular case, I might have done the same since your edit removed both prose and a reference from the article without providing an explanation. Cheers, Amalthea Talk 22:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Your allowed to. Josephjames21 (talk) 16:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * You leave little choice if you strip the article of all its references without giving an indication of why that is an improvement. I don't see it, and I strongly urge you again to discuss it on the article's talk page. If you explained your issues with the article I'm sure it can be worked out. If you continue on the road you're on however I'm sure that you will be blocked again for disruptive editing. -- Amalthea Talk 16:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

There isn't disruptive editing, my article make sense, and those other people's doesn't, so if you continue of the road your at, i'm sure you will blocked too.Josephjames21 (talk) 16:27, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * If you repeatedly remove content from an article without explanation while being asked to stop and explain by multiple editors it is disruptive. See DISRUPTIVE please. Also, you violated copyright when you claimed that you owned Image:Tiffany (Taryn Terrell).jpg. As can be seen at the duplicate Image:Taryn-terrell.jpg, copyright belongs to www.wrestlingrevealed.com. -- Amalthea Talk 16:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Amalthea Talk 16:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Tiffany and Alfonso R..jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tiffany and Alfonso R..jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Amalthea Talk 17:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Amalthea Talk 17:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. — Travis talk  18:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean? I don't assume articles are mine. Josephjames21 (talk) 18:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

3RR report
I have reported your edits at the noticeboard for edit warring. -- Amalthea Talk 19:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't Bully nobody, I said I would blocked them if the continued to make the article unsenseful, and I only reverted 3 Times, and then I can block you.Josephjames21 (talk) 19:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I have also reported your edits at the noticeboard for edit warring. Josephjames21 (talk) 19:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Heftwins.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Heftwins.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Amalthea Talk 19:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Hefnertwins.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Hefnertwins.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:Hefnertwins.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Hefnertwins.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Hefnertwins.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Hefnertwins.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Hefnertwins.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Amalthea Talk 19:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:KourtKardash.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:KourtKardash.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:KourtKardash.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:KourtKardash.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:KourtKardash.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:KourtKardash.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:KourtKardash.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Amalthea Talk 20:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tiptoety talk 20:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:ShannonTwins.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:ShannonTwins.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:ShannonTwins.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:ShannonTwins.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:ShannonTwins.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:ShannonTwins.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:ShannonTwins.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Amalthea Talk 21:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Amalthea Talk 21:44, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 22:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Spike7000
What are you talking about?....I hardly get on it....you just can jump to conclusions.....our isp do not even match!.....your crazy....and idk why you still edit if you keep on doing violations....just look at your talk page!!....is full of violations....whatever! I am not going to argue with a kid. Art 281 (talk) 03:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Heftwins.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Heftwins.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Amalthea Talk 19:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Hefnertwins.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Hefnertwins.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:Hefnertwins.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Hefnertwins.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Hefnertwins.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Hefnertwins.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Hefnertwins.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Amalthea Talk 19:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:KourtKardash.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:KourtKardash.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:KourtKardash.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:KourtKardash.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:KourtKardash.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:KourtKardash.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:KourtKardash.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Amalthea Talk 20:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tiptoety talk 20:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:ShannonTwins.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:ShannonTwins.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:ShannonTwins.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:ShannonTwins.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:ShannonTwins.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:ShannonTwins.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:ShannonTwins.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Amalthea Talk 21:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:Josette Bynum in 2008.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Amalthea Talk 21:44, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 22:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Josephjames21
What are you talking about?....I hardly get on it....you just can jump to conclusions.....our isp do not even match!.....your crazy....and idk why you still edit if you keep on doing violations....just look at your talk page!!....is full of violations....whatever! I am not going to argue with a kid. Art 281 (talk) 03:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Your obviously the kid. You have fragments and mispelled words in your edits. I think you should learn how to spell before you, post it! Josephjames21 (talk) 11:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

You do not tell me what to do. Why I'm I even arguing with you!....ugh. Whatever Art 281 (talk) 02:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joseph Prairie
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Joseph Prairie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Unsourced. Does not state why the person is notable, and is only one line long.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cssiitcic (talk) 22:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you post improperly-placed jokes on Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. SRX 18:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

[[File:RossPerot.jpg]]
I've tagged this for speedy delete as a copyvio. Evidence provided on the image page.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 20:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Maryse
It is not a notable event, and saying that it is the beginning of a feud is violating WP:CRYSTAL and WP:V. If something develops from this in the next few weeks, then it can be added, but until then it is non-notable week-by-week which has no place in an encyclopedia. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It is a notable event because Maryse hasen't made an appearance on SmackDown! in the last week. So it isn't week-by-week because there was no news for last week, sorry but it stays. 15:37, 3 March 2009
 * No it's not. I'm not going to revert again because I'll break WP:3RR, but you're wrong. Week-by-week means listing every match/result/appearance on a show, be it Raw/SD/ECW, a combination of two of them or all three. It doesn't matter if she didn't appear last week. Noting that she appeared on whatever date, then 2 weeks later, even on a different show, is still week-by-week. Especially since the event in question is not notable. And you have provided nothing to back up that is notable, except unproven speculation about a feud that might or might not happen.
 * By the way, if you're going to reply to me here, please leave a note at my talk page stating this, so I can respond to your comments. Thanks, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Have you ever read WP:CRYSTAL? There's no way you can prove that a feud is going to happen. It's pure speculation on your part. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No it's not. By the way, I also suggest that you read WP:OWN. You cannot tell me to not comment in a discussion at Talk:Maryse Ouellet simply because I disagree with you. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:25, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

<--Personally, I think it makes you look bad, not me. Besides other people participating in the discussion will/would not have known my stance on the matter, and I am quite entitled to give it. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I was expressing my opinion to anyone else who was going to contribute to the discussion as I have previously said. And I still think it's not notable, so we are going to have to wait for other people's thoughts on the matter. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, too late now. *Shrugs* Additionally, I don't get why you just didn't say that in the first place... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 07:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

The Girls Next Door
So.. given that the last season just ended and we have no idea what to expect from next season, care to back up your edits? Got any reliable sources that the three current girls won't be featured - or that his new girlfriends will definitely be on the new season? &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Technically they already starting shooting the next season, so they are featured in it. Josephjames21 (talk) 19:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Again, what's your proof? We need reliable sources. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * E! network is my proof, they've already renewed it for a new season and they don't have Kendra, Bridget or Holly, so they're using Hef's three new girlfriends.Josephjames21 (talk) 19:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That's nice. The end of last season didn't definitively say one way or the other. We have a policy around here called WP:V, which means that for anything to be included, it needs to be verifiable. And that's done with reliable sources. In this case primary sources would be acceptable, but the fact is that you haven't given any sources. So add some sources in, or I'm going to revert your edits again. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hugh Hefner already confirmed a sixth season and that his new girlfriends would star in the show. So stop looking for faults in edits of good writers here on Wikipedia. I put a link Crystal Harris that you erased which you shouldn't have because there is information on the Hugh Hefner page about Crystal. Josephjames21 (talk) 19:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.  TJ   Spyke   19:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.  T ru  c o   19:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * What did I do? Josephjames21 (talk) 16:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  TJ   Spyke   20:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I wasn't testing, I was officially changing it. Josephjames21 (talk) 20:50, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It already says his ringname is The Brian Kendrick, not need to write his name TWICE.  TJ   Spyke   21:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.  TJ   Spyke   21:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Please refrain from lying, or I will 3RRR report you. Josephjames21 (talk) 21:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.   TJ   Spyke   21:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I would also like to point out that no one objected on the template's talkpage to it being The Brian Kendrick . That is consensus by default, if you think it should be differently then you should discuss it on the talkpage instead of ignoring the rules.  TJ   Spyke   21:39, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] It's written once, and if you keep threatening me, I will report you! Josephjames21 (talk) 21:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

This is your only warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 23:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

February 2010
Hi. Do not revert another editor's reversion of your edits unless you can provide a valid, policy-based rationale in your edit summary. The information you previously added to Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew was removed because you did not cite a reliable, verifiable source, as is required by the WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:RS policies. Reverting that removal without citing a valid rationale or providing any edit summary, as you did here, is a violation of thee policies, and can be considered to be disruptive editing.

Since this is not the first time you have violated these policies, as a look through your Talk Page history shows over a year's worth of warnings for adding unsourced or defamatory content to articles and violating WP:SYNTH (as well as other things like copyright violation, content blanking, exhibiting WP:OWN-type behavior, two separate blocks for violating WP:3RR, and a number of warnings for unspecified disruptive editing, as well as some uncivil comments you exchanged with another editor), I suggest you cease this behavior immediately, as this is your final warning. The next time you violate WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:RS, or engage in any form of violation of Wikipedia policies or guidelines, you will be blocked, and it will be for considerably longer than 24 hours. Nightscream (talk) 21:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)