User:Nikith Naini/Lactobacillus acidophilus/Ccd38148 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nikith Naini


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Lactobacillus acidophilus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lactobacillus acidophilus

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead = good lead, but very long; I'd probably stop the introduction after "ferments sugars into lactic acid"

Content = good, but a bit spread out

- comprehensive in environmental characteristics, effects on human/animals, how growth works, how it works with other species

- good explanation of community species and how it functions with them

- talk a bit about taxonomy

- therapeutic applications can probably have subsection headers

References = good and plentiful

in general, try breaking up the information into sections that make it easier to digest

- also, link other article pages throughout so it is easier to understand

- consider adding photos in the therapeutic applications area