User:NikkiCharlie/Marisa Boullosa/Rojasandrea Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

NikkiCharlie/Marisa Boullosa


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:NikkiCharlie/Marisa Boullosa
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Marisa Boullosa

Evaluate the drafted changes
The first couple of sentences in the lead are good, after that, there is too much focus on the artist’s education. Artist’s education can have its own subheading where you can go more into detail on what she studied and where. In the lead/intro you can be a little more broad and discuss a couple of highlights throughout her artistic career, not in detail, you can add the detail below.

The tab about her work has lots of good information that can be divided into a couple subheadings like art style, exhibitions/installations/public collections, and even another for her residency works. This would be just to navigate through the article more easily. You can even do a tab that highlights a couple artworks, her more notable works. The awards tab, I would suggest for it to be organized chronologically by date. The information does seem to be up to date and relevant to Marisa Boullosa.

Overall, the content provided adds more to the existing article and also reads neutral. It could be better organized and more information about her actual artworks could be added. Many of her achievements are mentioned but only one artwork is mentioned. As a reader, I would like to know more about her early life and her works in present day.