User:Nikkitorno/Two Dogs Site/Haleydean Peer Review

Peer review
I am reviewing Nikkitorno's work at User:Nikkitorno/Two Dogs Site. The introduction is very concise and informative, however this user could briefly describe what they will be talking about in the remainder of the article. Good leading sentence and great emphasis throughout the article on the historical purpose of the site. The description of the excavation process and article analysis clearly reflects the importance of the site as a lithic source for stone tools rather than a residential area. It would be helpful to have a few more credible sources. The content is very objective and non-biased. Try to avoid restating sentences in the introduction and conclusion. No grammatical or spelling errors. An image or map might enhance the article. Overall, great content and great writing.