User:NikoPico/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Pinus jeffreyi

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because a) I think it's a beautiful species and b) I think the article could say a lot more about it.

Evaluate the article
Lead section - Fairly concise, discusses the range of the species for the most part. Neglects phenotypic details of the tree, which are discussed in the article.

Content - Good detail in description and distribution, not much for ecology and uses.

Tone and Balance - Seems neutral and unbiased.

Sources and References - I believe all the sources look reliable and scientific. However, one is from enature.com and I have never heard of that site so I can't speak to its credibility. The links seem functional.

Organization and writing quality - Seems well organized, everything is grammatically correct and clear.

Images and media - 3 total images, informative and well captured. Could be useful to have closeup pictures of the leaves or cones since they are described in the article.

Talk page discussion - Big topic of discussion was the scented bark on Jeffrey Pines vs Ponderosa pines. Additionally, there was a request to move from 2018. This article is in 3 WikiProjects. Rating: Start class, Low importance)

Overall Impressions - Generally, I think everything the article has is good, I just overall would like there to be more content. I would consider it underdeveloped, but hope to contribute something of use myself.