User:Nilarlin/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Chromatography: (Chromatography)
 * I have chosen this article to evaluate because I think it is related to our course and we did Chromatography in some of lab experiment.

Lead

 * Guiding questions

The lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic and it includes a brief description of the article's major sections. It doesn't present any information that is is relate to the article and it is overall detailed and concise.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

The article's content is relevant to the topic and it is up-to-date since it was last updated on 29 October 2020. All the content are organized and detail-oriented. Additionally, the article doesn't seem to have any Wikipedia's equity gaps and it address topics related to current methods used in many biomedical research laboratory.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions

The article is neutral and there seem no claims that appear biased toward a particular position. The viewpoints are neither overrepresented nor underrepresented and the article doesn't persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another. It basically explain different techniques of chromatography, the differences and their usage.


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

All facts in the article are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information and cited with wiki link wherever it needs. The sources are thorough and reflects the literature on the topic it discusses. The sources are current as most of the cited sources are from 2000's and they are pretty much diverse coming from many authors and they mentioned historically marginalized individuals and scientist where possible. Upon checking the link, they are also working properly.


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions

The article is well composed with clear tone. It is concise and easy to understand. The article has no grammatical or spelling errors. It is well-organized and clearly express major points in a step by step fashion.


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

The article includes images of different types of chromatography to enhance understanding of the topic and wiki link images are visually appealing and helpful for further understanding of the topic.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions

There is few citation error that is present in the topic. The article is Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment and it is a part of WikiProjects Chemistry. The way Wikipedia discussed this topic is similar to the way we've talked about in the class.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions

Article's overall status is very impressive. It's easy to understand and express in detail step by step basis. Overall, the articles is pretty awesome and discuss every aspect of chromatography and it can be said that it is well-developed article.


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: