User:Nilsuc/Camp TURKSOM/Shenali.P Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Nilsuc
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Camp TURKSOM

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? No

Lead evaluation
The introduction to the article provides a concise description of Camp Turksom. I think you could clean up the introductory sentence so that is just states "Camp Turkson is a military base and defence university in Mogadishu, Somalia, serving as..." You have also clearly outlined major sections for your article.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes - but only a preliminary draft.

Content evaluation
I think you provide a logical flow for your article, going from your introduction into a history and then function of the base. I think you will probably need to add some other sections about the effects of the camp, the outcome of its trainings, and the importance of the camp.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Ye
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation
Overall, this appears to be a very neutral article that summarizes the function of Camp Turksom. I think that if you add future sections on the outcome/purpose of the camp, you will have to be careful to not bias your own perspectives as you are commenting on the 'effectiveness' and 'success' of something. However, I think you won't have a problem with this as everything thus far is presented in a very neutral manner.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation
Good use of links and sources! All the links work, and you've linked things in appropriate places. You've also built up a good reference list - keep it up :)

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Some
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation
Overall, the breakdown of the article is logical and coherent. There are a few sentences which could be tidied up - particularly the beginning, as this sets the overall tone of the piece.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes

Images and media evaluation
The side bar/infobox containing the map of Somalia and the location of Camp Turksom is definitely useful! You've captioned this well, and overall I find the side bar a very useful place with quick facts and visual imagery to support your content. You've added things like links to the current commander, and depicted flags of Somalia and Turkey which assists our understanding of the Camp. I think you should definitely continue to use this type of imagery and media throughout your article, especially given the importance of geographical context for your piece. This is definitely a strong point for your article!

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Yes
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes

New Article Evaluation
I think this is a good new article. The links and references are thorough and all work, and you have linked things in appropriate places so as to make the article more discoverable. The list of sources for what you have so far is exhaustive, and accurately represents the literature available on the subject. Given that this is a first draft, I definitely think you're in the right direction in terms of sources and notability.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Overall, I think this is a solid first piece of work. I would work on tidying up some sentences and giving more of an outline as to where you want your article to go, and why your article is actually important and relevant. Right now, the history and function of Camp Turksom is clear, but we don't know why it is important for Somalia, or what the relationship between Turkey and Somalia is (this could also be another section, and I think it would be useful contextual information). As of right now, you have done a good job of addressing the who, what, when and where portion of your article. Your use of infoboxes and images was also really helpful, and I'd love to see more of that throughout your work. Good job!