User:Ninafar/sandbox

Article Evaluation week 2

I picked the article on Movius Line.

Within this article everything seems to be relevant. The article begins by explaining what the subject is clearly and explains who it was founded by, beginning the article off it a clear way. As you keep reading you can see the clear discriptive explanation of why and where the idea for this line came to be. The picture on the side helps illistrate the subject to a better level. Everything within the article is neutral and does not make any claims. Towards the end of the article it explains the the rie of this line and makes sure to state that they are theories. This allows the reader to understand that the write up was not bias. Som thing that is not explained is why the need for the line came to be. The links for this article (ones that are hyperlinked) Work, however; two Of them are in chinese which made it hard for me to check. From what I could read the information was right. Er the most part this article is what we discussed in class. The Only difference between class and the article is that the article went more in dept than class.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

week 4 Contribution to Chams article

I plan to contribute a better / more acurrate information. I plan to edit anything that is false. I plan to check links to ensure information is correct and has reliable sources.