User:Ninapetersenn/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Rabies

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because I did ask my friend what I should look up. I think it's funny because we learned about this in class the other day. My first impression of this article is that it is very long, and there are a ton of sources cited.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Overall, I think this article was very great. Everything in this article is relevant to the topic. There is nothing that was distracting throughout. To me it seemed like nothing was out dated, but I am also not sure completely of this topic. I also saw that some sources are from 13 years ago, but I don't know if they have been disproved or not. This did not misrepresent any marginalized populations, as there was no talk of it.

The article appears to be neutral and just portraying all of the facts.

The citations that I clicked on, the links all work. The articles that I clicked on all went to abstracts and scientific articles about rabies. I will say that this seems like it is very reliable. They looked like very neutral sources. These all came from a very diverse set of authors.