User:Ninapetersenn/Massachusetts smallpox epidemic/Cotviola Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Massachusetts Smallpox Epidemic group


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ninapetersenn/Massachusetts_smallpox_epidemic?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Massachusetts smallpox epidemic

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Lead. The lead section of this article was mainly about smallpox itself and not necessarily about the article content or sections. I don't think that this is a bad thing, and I actually really like the idea of starting the content of the article with information about smallpox, but maybe writing an additional lead section to put at the very start of the article would work.
 * Content. The content added by the group really works well. It is relevant to the topic and up to date. It also addresses the way that Native American groups were effected which is really important as well.
 * Tone and Balance. The new content added by the group remains neutral and balanced.
 * Sources. All of the new content that I can see is backed up reliably by new sources. They are current, well written, and well integrated into the article. I checked some of the links and they all appear to be functional.
 * Organization. I really like the changes that were made by way of organization. I think that the new sections are well arranged and well fleshed out, and I think that despite the fact that the changes make the article much longer, the group organized it in a way that makes it easier to read.
 * Overall. I think that this group did a really good job with their draft. I don't think that much even needs to be changed.