User:Ninapetersenn/Massachusetts smallpox epidemic/Kaitlynnehafer Peer Review

This article is quite short and could use some expanding. It has an introduction and it clearly states in the beginning what this article will cover. The opening does not mention one of the major sections that is covered in the article. The lead is concise and could even add some details if possible. You could update to reflect more recent times and mention all the way as to this year. Small pox has been around for a long time and you could express that if you would like. The content is neutral and does not have bias. The sources seem reliable and I am able to open them. The content is concise and well written but I believe that you could extend in certain areas and add more up to date sections if possible and flows with the article.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)