User:Ninapetersenn/Massachusetts smallpox epidemic/Pyruvate kinase Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ninapetersenn

I think everything in the sandbox is relevant to the topic chosen, and doesn’t go off-topic or on any tangents. The sources all look appropriate for the material, and all the links do work. I think everything looks great, the only comment I have (and this is a super small thing) is that sometimes the writing style can get a little bit informal, but that’s probably not a huge deal.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)