User:Ninieasad/Sociology of the family/Aubreydosky Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? User: Ninieasad
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ninieasad/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? In the "Current Tasks" section I'm unsure if that is going to be taken out later but the first sentence of that section wasn't as concise on the topic, though in the section below it was a good introduction sentence.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is not overly detailed, though clear to be in the beginning stages of drafting I'm sure more details will be added, but I think it will only make the article stronger, just be wary of unconscious bias.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, though I would add the only way I knew the article was focused on "Sociology of the Family" is by the title when I was assigned to this article to review, I suggest simply adding the title to the top of the draft! Otherwise, everything was in agreement.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Overall it seems to be neutral but for one sentence "In the past few decades, technology has drastically advanced, and with it, so has its effect on society" I would suggest adding someone credible who made that statement so it is not misinterpreted to be the wiki authors bias as to technologies effects on our society.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? "In the past few decades, technology has drastically advanced, and with it, so has its effect on society." I only state this sentence because after reading I thought to myself Why? and Is this a biased statement or fact?
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented? I think just right.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Not much, I believe there is only so much data they could collect from the opposing side in order to have a balance of sources on each viewpoint.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes!

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes, in the Effects of Technology on Parenting section "She studied approximately 2oo dual-income families..." I believe it was meant to be written as 200.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, very well.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Not yet.
 * Are images well-captioned? n/a
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? n/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? n/a

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes, three total at this time.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? It is not exhaustive. Not all, but reasonable for the amount of information in the draft.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Data, I think it is very difficult to argue with data therefore by having it within the article it strengthens it greatly.
 * How can the content added be improved? Simple grammar, organization of the paragraphs and the awareness of potential bias showing through.