User:NinoBarbati/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
The Kite Runner

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This is a school assignment, and I have read The Kite Runner before.

Evaluate the article
The lead section describes the overarching motifs of the book and reactions to the book in brevity. The content is very evenly distributed with a brief but very telling synopsis, an all-encompassing character section, a theme section, and a multifaceted critical reception and controversy section. For the critical reception section, a wide range of viewpoints are offered in the neutral tone that Wikipedia prides itself on. The theme section has some slightly subjective word choice that may try to inject the author's own interpretation, but that interpretation is a widely recognized consensus and necessary to the content of the article. There is a plethora of strong sources. Overall, the organization of the writing and use of images and external links are simple, easy to follow, and helpful. The article is rated as a good article, and has some productive feedback in the talk section as well as some intense political debate. I think the accusations levied against the author about being partisan in the critical reception section are harsh and non-neutral in and of themselves. On the whole, this article was very satisfactory for Wikipedia, and only needs slight reworking of word-choice, if anything.