User:Nish0912/Feminist political theory/Kporras5 Peer Review

General info

 * I. Which article are you evaluating? Feminist Political Theory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_political_theory Nish0912: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nish0912

Evaluate the drafted changes
sorry, i thought I had uploaded this earlier!

II. Evaluate the article

Evaluate the article using the following rubric. Note, you do not need to leave comments for each question. Use the comments boxes to elaborate on notable successes or highlight key shortcomings of the article.

Lead section
A good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.

Content
A good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.

Tone and Balance
Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.

Sources and References
A Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.

Organization and writing quality
The writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.

Images and Media
III. Overall impressions

In ~200 words, address the following four questions below.

●       What is the article's overall status?

●       What are the article's strengths?

●       How can the article be improved?

●       How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

''The article “Feminist Political Theory” is rated as a Start-class article of ‘high-importance’ by several wikiprojects and I agree that this article provides a good base for improvements and expanding on ideas. Each section could definitely undergo more in-depth statements and context for the different thoughts within feminist political theory (FPT). The article’s strengths include its strong structure because of the ease at which you can research those specific categories of FPT and easily incorporate those details into their respective sections to construct a more thorough article. The article can use improvements in its detail regarding the different thoughts of FPT, and this should be relatively easily because of its foundation. These detailed sections very curtly summarize the political theories, not entirely doing justice in its explanations of the theories, like the ‘Postmodernist feminist’ section. What exactly does “pick and mix” identities mean? Clarification in small things like this can really improve the article. Taking out the parts when “we” or “our” is said will also aid in neutralizing the article, as well as including time periods when these specific FPTs were created or became popular would help. The article has room to become a more comprehensive and developed article.''

To find an author’s/user's Talk page, go to their Wikipedia User page — something like " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DZOBrien ". You'll see the Talk link at the top left of the page. Click "New Section" on the Talk page and enter your message. Remember to sign with four tildes! (Kporras5 (talk) 05:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC))