User:Nixeagle/potential crap 3

A month later, we have removed quite a few "crap" pages. There are still 6,000 or so that remain in this grouping. A page is considered "crap" if it has no wikilinks and at least one external link. These are sectioned into sections of 25 as before. This time I will section the list off into groupings of 1,000 per page. This will allow folks to sign off on sections as they get done. I would highly suggest on every page you visit, if its "good" to wikilink and improve the page if its not a speedy or a prod. This will allow future runs of the program to pick up poor quality articles, rather then the same articles deemed "ok" over and over. Again this list is a result of statistics for Veropedia. /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7
 * Note, on these list, there are quite a few red links, please just ignore them or remove them manually. On the next update those red links will go away, as well as any other articles deleted or cleared up. There is a large number on this page as a result of a 2 week delay from the database dump to the generation of this list. ——  Eagle 101 Need help? 03:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)