User:Njanrd/sandbox

Article Evaluation
The article represents many countries of origin that made advances to glass across history, but there is little representation to the americas impact on the history of glass and the advancement of glass science. Many of the citations reference journal articles that have credibility, such as The American Ceramic Society. Yet, some come from websites that dont have their own citations for the information on the website.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

The article stops at about 1960's for the modern history of glass. Many leaps in glass history have been made in the past 58 years. The article also touches about the applications of the glass in each culture, but I think it would be better if an application and advancements in applications section was developed. The glass wiki page is a start-class page with top importance, while the history of glass is a start-class page with mid-importance
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Article Drafting
Special:Contributions/Andrew.Jacobs