User:Nkaba224/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Nuclear power

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article helps us understand the impact of nuclear power on the environment .The effect of nuclear power is it ability of diffussing low-carbon and production of more unit per energy, compare to the other source of power which have had more accident and large volume of air pollution and less energy efficiency. My first insight of the article was the well structure paragraph and the way the sources where relatable and the strong support it had over the nuclear power topic.

Evaluate the article
The lead does include a consistent and well developed description of the subject, in the major section there was a briefing paragraph. about the past, which leads after to the first production to how to improve and augment efficiency. Unfortunately the lead does not have a non section that hasn't later been discussed in the post paragraph. The lead was well composed with the soul. purpose of doing what an introduction should do give you a chronologic explanation of what we are about to read.

The nuclear power paper had a very dense information but made sure to not over expose the reader with information and was up to date with future projections .The content is well structured with a guideline in case you get confused. Speaking of table of content, there is apart discussing the further reading of relatable topic.

The article has a neutral point of view toward the topic at hand, with a heavy bias toward the positive impact compare to it competitor or unconventional predecessor like coal or petroleum energy sources .There is no overrepresented point of view during the evaluation ,with fridge point of view. There is also a persuasive timeline driving away reader from other sources of energy power plant toward nuclear power sources.

The sources and references provided by the articles is strongly backed up with sources that can further elaborate.Some of the sources are not up to date but still has a good reflection on the understanding of the topic .The authors also made sure to include a historical section with time line references and must definitely their is more peer assessment up to date sources out there with extreme details on the topic. I also took an infection time to check that every link was perfectly functional.

Writing quality in this article seem like many authors had the changed to touch up on, is it very clear and easy to go through with no grammatical errors, one thing they could improve could me the images layout.