User:Nkaba224/Hecla Mining/Joq Oliver Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Nkaba224 Link to draft you're reviewing

Hecla Mining (reviewing the Revisions tab) Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)  Hecla Mining

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hello,

I got assigned to review your article. You did not have a sandbox for it, which makes it difficult to follow your edits.

You are using the main article as a draft page and have deleted most of the previous work left there from other Wikipedians.

I can't tell if this was intentional or an accident.

Overall good work; it looks really good and isn't hard to read. One of the most significant issues I see is the lack of good references. There is a sentence, "With Lester Randall as president, the company soars higher because he reconciled Hecla's balance sheet and sold its interest in exchange for stock"

Where you cite a previous version of the Hecla Mining page (that you deleted), it is not a good idea, in general, to use another wiki article as references.

The section on Ore Processing is excellent. I'm just unsure sure if you can use a mining companies web page as your primary source. I would check if the Carleton library, if any, reports back up their claims.

The work on the lead section great, and the way it was redone provides the information needed. It seems to cover all the information in your copy of the page.

The content is good, but I would think about adding some of the previously there work. Potentially a list of deposits in the world would help the reader get a sense of where Hecla Mining takes place.

Sources and References

I would look to the Sources left by Kuzey Gunesli.

I am personally using 43-101 reports in my arctic and have found them very informative.

Overall keep up the excellent work. The information is there, and I enjoy your writing style. I wasn't able to find any overt grammar and spelling mistakes.

Using more credible sources can go a long way.