User:Nkanfer/G. E. Moore/Igetthaloot Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

G.E. Moore group as a whole


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nkanfer/G._E._Moore?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * G. E. Moore

Evaluate the drafted changes
I like the draft so far. What you could add is a more in-depth analysis of the open-question argument, as well as the criticism and responses to Moore's argument on the open-question argument. The actual article also mentions the paradox of analysis and the assumption that if 'good' were definable, it would be an analytic truth about 'good,' which is rejected by some contemporary moral realists like Richard Boyd and Peter Railton. The page also discusses responses that appeal to the Fregean distinction between sense and reference, allowing that value concepts are special and sui generis, but insisting that value properties are nothing but natural properties, similar to the strategy taken by non-reductive materialists in the philosophy of mind.