User:Nlapunzi/Cellana exarata/IndiPink0117 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nlapunzi


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Cellana exarata


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cellana exarata

Evaluate the drafted changes
First of all, I liked the overall content of the article. They were very interesting and had all of the content needed to learn about this species; however, I did find some structural misplacement and extra information that is not relevant to the species.

The information in the section "Classification" seems like it can be added to the Lead.

Also, the information in the sections "Distribution", "Habitat", and "Description" (except the last part where it briefly talks about the coloration of the species) could be combined into "Distribution and Habitat."

The section, "Differing Phylogeography," seems like it has extra information about another species which is not necessary.

The information in the sections "Reproduction", "Growth", and "Ecological and evolutionary factors influencing growth" can be combined into "Reproduction and Development."