User:Nlky/sandbox

=Article evaluation=

Sort of. I think the 'teachers' section is a little odd, and could/should be merged with the 'translanguaging pedagogy' section. That section is also a bit more of an opinion than fact or shared understanding. In general, I think the wording could use some revision: For example, the term 'multilingual' can be thought of as in direct opposition to a translingual lens, where as multilingual view tend to treat languages as 'whole' or 'complete' and used as additive, yet translingual theories suggest a paradigm shift away from 'whole' language theory.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

References are a little old. Very little from the last 4 years, which for such an emerging field does not seem like an inevitability based on lack of resources.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

In general, this page seems to reflect the views of the authors read, yet these are closer to opinions than fact. I feel like the entire page could be re-written so as to indicate this (or in more neutral terms). For Example: "The development of translanguaging as a part of second language acquisition pedagogy signifies an ideological shift in bilingual and multilingual education systems..." Does it 'signify', or did someone say that it did? If so, who said it? That kind of thing.
 * What else could be improved?

There's a lot going on in the talk page, some of which addresses the above, other which seems pretty constructive. It looks like someone has addressed some of the concerns (eg. 'major debates' was added?).

Nlky (talk) 17:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

=Practice Using Citations=

=Assigned Article for Group Project= History of Writing/ Writing materials

Ref 1: Lindström, T., Wågberg, L., & Larsson, T. (2005, September). On the nature of joint strength in paper-A review of dry and wet strength resins used in paper manufacturing. In 13th fundamental research symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 457-562). Cambridge, UK: The Pulp and Paper Fundamental Research Society.

Ref 2: https://www.businessinsider.com/history-of-the-tablet-2013-5

Ref 3: https://openlibrary.org/works/OL233245W/Printing_and_writing_materials Ref 4: https://openlibrary.org/works/OL233245W/Printing_and_writing_materials Ref 5: https://www.economist.com/technology-quarterly/2008/09/04/touching-the-future