User:Nmneuro/Prostaglandin D2 receptor/PolyMurrase Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nmneuro

(Evaluating total changes made to article)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Compared to the starting state of the article, you effectively created a new article by expanding it from being a "true" stub, adding worthwhile information about the receptor's structure and role in the body. The lead now gives a basic summary of why the receptor matters, and the body is well-divided between structure and function. Stylistically there are a few things I would change which become more important as the article grows: Excessive quantitative detail about the receptor becomes less important as more information is added (e.g. info about the domains is more valuable than a raw amino acid count or molecular weight unless these values have some significance on their own). When adding information which is cited, you generally don't need to allude to the citation in the body (again unless the nature of the discovery itself is important) -> The sentence "In 2014, García-Solaesa et. al. described that the signaling pathway by which the PGD2 receptor mediates its effects begins with the binding of prostaglandin D 2 " doesn't add any information about the receptor itself, rather it is saying what the citation is even though you actually describe the pathway in the following sentence. I also appreciate that you added contrary research about the signaling pathway, which helps balance the perspective of the article. Overall great additions!