User:No1Knows/sandbox

== Article Evaluations ==

Roman Siege Engines
"This article sticks to the intended topic through the duration of the page. There is a good balance of pictures to text, enough to give visual examples without distracting the reader from the text. There is no obvious bias in the article and the writers seemed focused on providing solid facts. The selected points for the article are balanced in their representation, there is not one idea that took more of a precedence over another. The number of references are adequate but very few have links connecting the reader to those sources. The ones that could be found easily through other means seem to be more fact based than opinion based but still not the easiest to find. Only one of the sources seems to be older, the others are of more recent publishing. The talk page discusses language issues i.e. how some sentences needed to be constructed or edited. Another discussion point on the talk page revolves around real life applications of some of the topics mentioned on the page. This page in perticular is involved with two different WikiProjects; Military history and Classical Roman and Greek projects."