User:Noahjack2001/Bankruptcy Act of 1800/Cjones1232026 Peer Review

General info
Noah Jack2001
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Noahjack2001
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The content stays nutreal throughout the article. The lead opens us perfectly with a sentence that discribes and summeries what this whole article is going to be about. The content is up to date. The lead is a mixtuere of both consise but at the same time is detailed and gives a good intoduction into what is going to be in the article. There are no claims that lean towards a paricleuer side. All the sorces that are included are current and are a mixture of what type of source they are.