User:NoelaniV/Snowflake moray/RyanMontero Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

NoelaniV Snowflake Moray


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Snowflake moray


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Snowflake moray

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) Very excellent article overall stunning.
 * 4) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way?
 * 5) "Clouded Moray"- moray that looks like a dirty cloud.
 * 6) Check the sources:
 * 7) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 8) Yes
 * 9) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about?
 * 10) Yes, very clear to which animal the reader is learning about
 * 11) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 12) Yes
 * 13) What is the quality of the sources?
 * 14) Yes, very credible sources
 * 15) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article?
 * 16) Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * 17) Maybe a little more depth description of the species
 * 18) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 19) It is about 80% there but probably just need to explain just a little more in depth and it will be ready. Thanks.
 * 20) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 21) Give a very descriptive information of how the animal looks. I will look at the description and revise what I can.
 * 22) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?
 * 23) Need to be more descriptive and make sure to write a lot more during the break.