User:Noirtist

That's it, I'm done. I've had it. The Ian Stevenson article is simply too much hassle. Every day of my life now I am called a liar and it is claimed that I am misrepresenting sources. I have tried to improve the article but some editors are simply intent on making the article reflect their own view to the point of writing it in the style of a petulant 14 year-old. Every positive, or neutral statement has now to be qualified with something critical whether or not there is a source for it. I think the final straw is probably the misrepresentation of the RFC. If someone can claim that that RFC supports the use of the Encyclopedia of pseudoscience as a source then the argument is just not genuine. I cannot go on hitting my head against this particular brick wall. Bye. Noirtist (talk) 07:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)