User:NolanOriger/Cell Engineering/Lbucla88 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nolan Origer (user: NolanOriger)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:NolanOriger/Cell Engineering
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cell engineering

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

 * Comprehensive, detailed lead
 * Good introduction to topic and summary of article
 * Concise and easy to understand, includes helpful links for additional background information on specific terminology

Body:

 * Organization is clear; I like how the article is sectioned into various general ways to make use of cells and their products, and how there is supporting details with references to previous research experiments within each section
 * Etymology section is helpful, not required? But interesting and informative
 * Includes specific examples with references after associated statement
 * Appropriate grammar/sentence structure
 * Neutral, informative tone

References:

 * Abundant and appropriate references
 * Reliable sourcing and frequent statements with supporting citations

Coverage:

 * Provides broad overview of cell engineering strategies and good variety of supporting research as reference
 * Image of engineered cells helps establish general audience's understanding and introduction to topic
 * Looks like a great, informative article!!