User:Nold0400/Georg von Peuerbach/HARA0201 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nold0400


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nold0400/Georg_von_Peuerbach?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Georg von Peuerbach

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead section is well organized and reflects the content that has been discussed in the article. The content that has been added to the article is accurate and is relevant to the topic that is under consideration. The content added is neutral in tone and it is not persuading anyone. The sources used are credible and from a variety of authors because the links provided are accurate and they work as well as the content is peer-reviewed. The added content is concise, clear, relevant, and is well organized according to the article's style. However, some grammatical and spelling mistakes need correction, as well as some sentences, need reorganization. No additional images have been added to the article as this may be because the image that is already there reflects the content well enough so no further images may not be needed. Overall, the added content has improved the article as it gives more information on the topic and also includes the information that was missing in the original article. The content makes the article more informative and credible by providing reliable sources and the important facts and information that were missing. Moreover, to improve the added content article should be read over and over again to correct the grammatical and spelling mistakes and to reorganize the sentences that need reorganization.