User:Nolss011/Phyllobates bicolor/Paigeberzinski Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nolss011


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nolss011/Phyllobates_bicolor?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Phyllobates bicolor

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead -

The original article's lead is descriptive yet concise, it is not in need of editing unless more important and lead-relevant information is added to the body of the article.

Content -

There is little content on the original article, and nothing about conservation. The information added to the sandbox is a great start, especially within the conservation section. I like that you have a timeline planned for your possible edits.

Tone and Balance -

The original article seems to have a good tone and all of the included information is balanced in size and is relative to the importance of the information itself. The information added in the sandbox is also neutral and balanced.

Sources and References -

Good start with the sources, well-organized.

Organization -

Since the information presented in the sandbox draft is more of a rough outline, the wording isn't grammatically correct yet. I have no doubts that it will be once the article is finalized.