User:Nolss011/Phyllobates bicolor/Ryanzisk26 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nolss001


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nolss011/Phyllobates_bicolor?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Phyllobates bicolor

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) Lead
 * 2) Right now the lead has not been edited to reflect the additions, but a lot of the edits are bullet points about things that he wants to add in the future but just haven't yet. With the content that is currently written, I don't think that adding anything to the lead would be advisable right now, but once the edits have been finalized, more edits to the lead should be done.
 * 3) Content
 * 4) The content related to how people get the toxins out of the frogs is relevant to the topic, because the previous sentence to the edit talks about how poison darts are made.
 * 5) I feel like some content that should be added to the conservation section would include the history of how people have tried to conserve the frogs, rather than talking about how there's not a lot of population data on the frogs.
 * 6) Tone and Balance
 * 7) The article edits take a consistent unbiased tone that matches the rest of the article.
 * 8) Sources and References
 * 9) All of the content and plans for new content are backed up by cited sources. A lot of the sources are from the 1900s though and could be considered outdated.
 * 10) Organization
 * 11) The content written is very concise and does not have any spelling errors.
 * 12) Images and Media
 * 13) There are no images/media.
 * 14) Overall Impressions
 * 15) I feel that there is a lot of potential, but more research and writing needs to be done. The writing that is done is great though.