User:Nomakm/Dr. Catalina Martinez/Sharkiemare Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nomakm


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Nomakm/Catalina Martinez


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think that your lead is strong - it is concise but hits the important parts of the article as you have it now. It may not be necessary to include where she went to school, but I don't think there is any harm in including it, either. This is another weird stylistic thing, too, but just something to consider: maybe don't use her first name after an initial mention in a paragraph? It might be sufficient (and flow better) to only use her last name thereafter.

You could probably go wild on the wiki links. There are a lot of subjects that you could link to that might cement the page in the Wikipedia aether a little more firmly, as well as being relevant to the subject. These include some of the awards/honors that you listed, as well as some of the subjects/programs she is involved in.

The order of the sections and the flow makes a lot of sense. I personally wouldn't change anything. I like how you included the volunteering section separately.

I think that your images are really great, and definitely enhance the article. The citations are also strong, and I don't see any areas where you have anything important uncited or where there is any bias/opinion.

I did notice a few small spelling/grammar mistakes, so maybe check for those before you move the page up. It really strikes me as very strong, other than these few things.