User:Nomymelon/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Sustainable Gardening
 * Article Evaluation
 * The articles content is relevant to the topic of sustainable gardening. It's written neutrally for the most part, but there's a sentence or two that seem biased. No there is a claim or two missing a citation. Three of the citations are reliable, but I'm not sure information pulled from a gardening magazine is. It vaguely talks about the range of demands for sustainability integration but doesn't tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. Other Wikipedians emphasized the need for updated citations and added a notability tag regarding the name of the article (it was later changed).
 * Sources
 * https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11252-019-00921-2
 * 

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Sustainable Yield
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content in this article is relevant to the topic of sustainable yield. I think more information could be added to certain sections. It's mostly neutral, but there are a few sentences that question its neutrality. The sources are mostly reliable, they include scientific journals whose content is mostly if not entirely to do with sustainable yield. This article doesn't tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. It's a relatively short article. This article has been a subject of support course assignments multiple times, not a lot going on in the talk page other than the addition of updated sources.
 * Sources
 * 
 * 

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Coral Reef Conservation Program
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content in this article is very relevant to the topic of the Coral Reef Conservation Program being discussed. I think it's mostly neutral, but some of its statements require citations to avoid any indication of biases. This article has a lot of sources, that are updated, and reliable. I didn't notice the article address one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. There are sentences within paragraphs that require citations. There haven't been a lot of edits or discussions done on this article.
 * Sources
 * 
 * 

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Regulation and Monitoring of Pollution
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content in this article is relevant to the topic of regulation and monitoring of pollution being discussed. The article appears to be neutral to the topic it's discussing, although there are statements that require citations to avoid a persuasive tone. There are sections that require expanding on (i.e. Europe). There are also sections that do not cite their sources (i.e. United Kingdom). This article provides a plethora of sources, most of which appear to be reliable, but are outdated. There are only a handful of articles published past 2010 and limited journal articles published in the past 3- 4 years. This article doesn't appear to cover one of Wikipedia's equity gaps, but it definitely could. This article has a good number of edits done to it as recent as January 2024.
 * Sources::

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Soil Acidification
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content in this article is very relevant to the topic of soil acidification. They expand on the causes of it, effects of it, and prevention/management. The article takes a neutral stance on the topic and is more so explaining the different aspects. The talk page emphasized the need for more information on mitigating soil acidification, why it's a problem, and where it's occurring. There are sentences in the article that require citations. There citations are reliable for the most part, but some of the pages linked no longer exist. This article doesn't cover one of Wikipedia's equity gaps and only discusses negative effects of soil acidification on plants, animals, water, etc.
 * Sources::